So, Bravo Mr. Baldwin. While you may have not pulled the trigger, how do you explain how the hammer of a single action revolver was cocked? We're waiting, and wondering when the local prosecutor will stop trying to shovel through the bullshit and charge you for the crime you committed. The scene is complete, they've called cut, and now you have to face the real world.
In Case You've Wondered
My blog is where my wandering thoughts are interspersed with stuff I made up. So, if while reading you find yourself confused about the context, don't feel alone. I get confused, too.
If you're here for the stories, I started another blog: scratchingforchange.blogspot.com
One other thing: sometimes I write words you refuse to use in front of children, or polite company, unless you have a flat tire, or hit your thumb with a hammer.
I don't use them to offend; I use them to embellish.
jescordwaineratgmail.com
Friday, December 3, 2021
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
According to a friend that watched the entire interview, he said he pulled the hammer back and released it.
ReplyDeleteThat's the same as pulling the trigger. A single action will fire, if the hammer is pulled back and released. That is neglect in my opinion, but in fairness, the evidence should be, at least, presented to a grand jury for review.
DeleteThe armorer was sloppy, and so were many others. Their negligence caused a death. This is more information that should be brought before a grand jury.
Plaintiff's Exhibit A . . .
ReplyDeleteThe revolver will be the strongest evidence exhibit for the prosecution. I doubt the defense will find any professional witness that will testify there is any reason to play with a firearm.
Delete