Impeachment, or Not?

Impeachment is a dead-end street, without a willing Senate to try. The current Senate will never try Barrack Obama, so that's an unproductive path to follow.

What is to be done? When a machine is broken, you dismantle the piece, find what doesn't work, and make the necessary repairs.

That's the best way to handle the current problems. Dismantle the Administration, replace the broken pieces and reassemble to a working machine.

Where do we start? Eric Holder. Too many egregious violations of laws point to an unwillingness by Holder to  do his job. Congress needs to demand he appoint a special counsel to investigate. If he refuses, then they start impeachment proceeding against him. While Democrats may balk, they will ultimately understand without protection from a rogue Attorney General, in a future Republican administration, they too could find themselves in an untenable position.

Will this work? I think so, but it requires a constant demand for action by not only those in Congress, but with citizens constantly pushing for answers and avoiding media outlets that refuse to participate in justice.

The mid-term elections are forecast to be a bloodbath for some members of Congress. Those wishing to appear favorable will recognize the necessity, even if they don't like becoming involved. Those that already know the U.S. government doesn't work, without checks and balances, will only have to continue with what they already started.

Barrack Obama is either terribly incompetent, or on a mission to make vast changes, without following the guidelines specified in the Constitution. No matter the reason, he can't do it on his own and, when it becomes a liability to be involved, the number of willing participants dwindles rapidly.