When I was young, a visit to the doctor was and annual occurrence. at most, for a DPT booster...if something like a broken bone, or stitches, wasn't required. I remember four events that required a special visit. One was for stitching up my chin after trying to tight-rope walk on a bassinet. One was for a broken finger while playing dodge ball, one was for addressing red streaks running up my leg after being stung by a wasp, and one was for being knocked out, with a concussion, while playing softball in gym. Bad scrapes, cuts that didn't cause large open wounds, colds, flu, measles, mumps, and chicken pox were handled at home without a visit to the doctor. A visit to the ER was out of the question. That was for life-threatening events, which was decided by parents, emergency personnel, and finances.
Today, people go to urgent care, or emergency rooms, for things not contemplated as requiring such things in the past. A visit to either shows people ratchet-jawing on their phone as they wait for the doctor, or nurse practitioner. Very sick children I can understand, but when they're fidgeting, complaining, and don't show any sign of severe malaise, or injury, I wonder if there is really a necessity for the visit. That brings me to my question: What percentage of visits are medically necessary, and what percentage could have been handled at home, with over the counter medications? It seems the percentage is probably too high for unnecessary visits, but that's just an opinion.