Sedition?

According to a New York Times anonymous editorial, there are members of the Trump administration intent on destroying the President's ability to perform his job. Regardless of opinion, or supposed good intents, if these people are not just fabricated sources for headlines, they're criminally involved with sedition.

Personally, I think the "source" is either a former member of the administration, or a composite fabrication of some former members of the administration. Who wrote the editorial is yet to be known, but they've admitted to a crime, and the FBI should pursue those involved.

The New York Times, by being involved with this, is also criminally conspiring in a crime of sedition. There is no good that can come from this article, and at best, it only causes discord. At worst, it is a deliberate effort to circumvent all rules of law to remove a sitting President. If foreign individuals are involved, the crime becomes treason.

I think this will cause an interesting turn of events. There are multiple agencies of the government involved in the safety of the President, and the nation. Included with these agencies is the military. I don't think the military will sit on its hands in a situation like this. When it becomes involved, agencies such as FBI will find they've lost the initiative. That may be a good thing, since the FBI has a dirty house, and refuses to clean it up.

Tine will tell how this turns out, but the blatant effort to destroy the President can't be ignored.

He Looks Like a Pawn

Bob Woodward is releasing a book on the "dirt" on Trump. With certain members of the Trump administration stating some of the book is false, Woodward's newest effort is appearing more like tabloid trash. If so, Woodward has abandoned his ethics, and turned into a pawn for the Democrats/Communists.

War and Civil Rights

In war, there are no civil rights. It's choreographed anarchy, with combatants and innocents. In the end, there are only winners and losers.

The founders realized the danger of invasion, the peril of unarmed citizens, and the Second Amendment was place in the Bill of Rights. Even with the inability of the government to protect, or in a situation were the rules of law were not followed by the government, the citizens were still able to protect the United States from enemies, both foreign and domestic.

With the intended effort to allow unbridled immigration, what some might consider a paradox was created. What happens to civil rights? Surely, we can't ignore civil rights? After all, that's what protects us from rogue government officials.

I don't consider it a paradox. I see it as some politicians forgetting the citizens are more important than any foreigner. The citizens come first, and anyone that ignores our borders is an invader, has not civil rights, and is dangerous to the United States. Invaders have no civil rights, and must be considered an enemy of the United States.

To some, my opinion may seem harsh, but where is the line between the sovereignty of the nation, and the hoards of those that only want the security of the United States, without following the laws created by the citizens? It should be the borders, but now it's the courts. That isn't where the deliberate efforts to destroy the United States should be fought.

So, without borders, how is a citizen to know if they're in danger from the invaders? The answer is always, which is a poor condition for US citizens. We've been infiltrated, the government ignores the danger, and it will eventually be up to the citizens to protect the country.

How does this all end? Will enough citizens vote to change the current laws? Will the effort to repel the invaders become a national directive? I don't know, but I do know every citizen should consider how they will protect there family. There is danger in the streets, and it's becoming worse.

We have invaders walking our streets with impunity, politicians that condone the invasion, and a tremendous amount of citizens refusing to recognize the perilous times. It's a war of ideas at this time. Only the foolish will ignore the possibility it may one day become a war of violence. 

Played Like a Cheap Violin

According to Bruce Ohr, Christopher Steele told him the Russians had Trump over a barrel.  This is interesting, since Steele was working for a muck-racking firm, which specialized on digging up dirt for hire.

When you connect the dots, and assume Russia didn't really want Trump to be President, the entire scheme to derail Trump was a calculated effort. Otherwise, not only did Russia play the former UK agent, they played member of the FBI, and the Department of Justice. If the effort was successful in the early stages, they'd get their old time good buddy Hillary Clinton (who paid for the Steel dossier) to sell more of the US to the Russians. Even if the scheme didn't work in the beginning, the long term effect would be political turmoil, and cause problems with the United States. It was a win-win for Russia, and they had plenty of political hacks to use like toilet paper.

Muellor is probably analyzing this new information, and wondering how he'll worm his way out of what Ohr's testimony revealed. After all, Muellor was kept in the loop with Ohr's contacts with Steele, even after he was fired by the FBI and Trump was elected. That points to criminal collusion, if he was intending to use the information against Trump.

Meanwhile, with the new information that Hillary's closet server was sending all her emails in real time, there is a suspicion classified information was used by the Chinese to root out U.S. agents, and the agents were murdered. If this is true, Hillary not only compromised classified information, she was instrumental in the murders of friends of the United States. In my book, that's treason, and demands that she is charged. 

There's a lot of things that need to be addressed, and the first is the ending of the Muellor probe. After that, charges need to be brought against all involved in the FBI, the DOJ, Fusion GPS, and anyone in the Clinton Campaign part of the effort to destroy Trump. Even Muellor might be dirty in all of these dealings. If so, he needs to be held accountable for his involvement.

Number Crunching

According to this site, U.S. taxpayers spend a tremendous amount of money on illegal aliens. Considering how tax payers are hounded for their money, are given no investing opportunity for the 15% taken for social security, and are threatened by the criminals slipping across the border, the anger is well founded for what is called "illegal immigration".

This needs to stop, and those that support the invasion of the United States exposed as the traitors they are. This isn't philanthropy; it's theft, treason and a direct threat to the sovereignty of the United States.